but, compared to Xojo, it is quite an overhead. You can create that backend component with Dart (the underlying programming language of "Flutter") or something else like python, PHP, node.js, etc.
That means that you build your own REST-API first (which does the SQL queries), and then you can access it from Flutter via JSON exchange. With Flutter's programming language ("dart"), you can quickly get around here by building a "bridge" between the front and back end (e.g., an SQL database).īut of course, you should do this via REST-APIs (no direct SQL queries). The most obvious one, but one that is usually not immediately apparent, Flutter is essentially designed for the front end and not the back end. It's an excellent concept, but there are limitations here too. With the latest version of Flutter, you can develop for Mac, iOS, Android, the Web, and (beta for Windows). Google tries that with "Flutter" and this quite successfully. There have always been manufacturers and development tools that try to serve multiple platforms. Xojo is sometimes a compromise, but that's, in my opinion, the nature of the beast. Consequently, this often means that you need a large number of tools and frameworks if you want to target multiple platforms. They excel on that job wonderfully, but only in this one specific area (or a very few). Specialized tools and programming languages often focus on a few tasks (one operating system, one platform, or a particular output type). A stove with an integrated microwave and a steamer has advantages (all-in-one) but limitations to two or three individual devices (the most obvious difference: you can not effectively use the functions simultaneously for multiple dishes).
To the best of my knowledge, the dryer unit still has limitations (for instance, less laundry weight possible) than two separate units. That is not only the case with programming but also with everyday household items. It is by definition impossible that an "all-rounder" can do everything and that just as well, quickly, stably, and future-proof as a specialized tool. Many tools have their justification and their pros and cons. Why using Xojo? You can only answer this question individually, and I can only share my experience. But as much as I like macOS over Windows, I pretty much love returning to Xojo when I had to use a different toolset. Sometimes you just don't have the freedom to choose your favorite tool or platform.
#XOJO JOBS HOW TO#
There may also be guidelines that dictate how to name your variables, functions, classes and how you need to document them with some companies.
#XOJO JOBS PROFESSIONAL#
I'm required to use specific tools from time to time because the customer specifies them in my professional life.
0 kommentar(er)
